Wiley Rein regularly represents both reinsurers and ceding companies in addressing the complex issues that arise under treaty, excess treaty, and facultative reinsurance arrangements. Our attorneys have handled reinsurance arbitrations and litigation in connection with significant claim disputes, including those arising from asbestos, environmental, mass tort, pharmaceutical, and product liability losses; have served as arbitrators in reinsurance disputes; and represent parties in litigation regarding arbitrability and the scope and structure of arbitrations under the Federal Arbitration Act.
Our representation of reinsurers and ceding companies also includes facilitating resolutions of contested claims without the necessity of arbitration or litigation through settlements, commutations, and other agreements. We have assisted our clients with respect to myriad underwriting issues, have examined the adequacy of reinsurance in mergers and acquisitions, and frequently provide our clients with advice concerning the evaluation and resolution of reinsurance and retrocession claims.
Through this work, we have experience with a wide range of recurring reinsurance issues, including:
- The application and limits of the "follow-the-fortunes" and "follow-the-settlements" doctrines.
- Allocation of loss and expense with respect to multiple occurrences, multiple policies, and multiple policy periods.
- Access to records and claim audits.
- Issues relating to substantiation of claims.
- The application of aggregation and accumulation provisions found in some reinsurance agreements.
- The existence and scope of coverage for declaratory judgment expenses.
- Reinsurance treatment of extra-contractual obligations.
- "Payback" claims.
- Claims and defenses based upon misrepresentation and non-disclosure, including rescission and reformation.
Wiley Rein and several of the partners active in the Reinsurance Practice are members of the AIDA Reinsurance and Insurance Arbitration Society (ARIAS-US). Our attorneys frequently write and speak on reinsurance topics in a variety of legal and industry publications and at meetings of professional and industry organizations.
ISSUE: DECEMBER 2014
IN THIS ISSUE
- Fourth Circuit Holds That Nonprofit Management Liability Policy Does Not Afford Coverage for Reimbursement of Stolen Social Security Benefits
- Two Lawsuits Involve “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” Where They Allege a Common, Continuing Scheme by the Insured
- Fee Dispute Exclusion in Bank E&O Policy Not Triggered by Allegations Concerning Overdraft Charges
- New York High Court Holds that Timely Notice to Broker Does Not Satisfy Required Notice to Insurer
- Court Holds That Policy’s Misrepresentation Clause Set Higher Standard for Rescission
- “No Direct Action” Rule Bars Claimant’s Declaratory Judgment Claim Against Insurer
- Criminal Indictment Constitutes Related Claim to Letter from State Attorney General
- Client’s Fee Dispute Claim Triggers Duty to Defend because it “Arises Out of” Firm’s Performance of Professional Services
- D&O Insurers Liable for $30 Million Judgment Arising from Dissolution of Hospital Affiliation
- No “Collusion” Requirement for I-v-I Exclusion
Procedural Flexibility in Reinsurance Arbitrations
By Richard L. McConnell
Spring 2010 | In-House Defense Quarterly
Renewable Energy Coverage: Insuring Geothermal Risks
By Sandra Tvarian Stevens
September 25, 2009 | Advisen Front Page News
U.S. Government Anti-Money Laundering Effort Increasingly Impacts Insurers
By Thomas W. Brunner and Cari Stinebower
Winter 2009 | ABA Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Committee News