Wiley Rein represents corporate clients in litigation and environmental enforcement actions in all regions of the United States. Our attorneys are deeply involved in governmental policy and legislative activities in the environmental arena at the state, federal, and international levels. We regularly counsel companies on environmental compliance and the environmental aspects of acquisitions, international trade, and real property transactions.
We have worked on rules and litigated cases arising under virtually every federal environmental program and state tort law, successfully defending cases arising under the Clean Air Act (CAA); the Clean Water Act (CWA); the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); the Endangered Species Act (ESA); the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); the Superfund statute and state tort law. Our attorneys have also assisted clients in rule-makings under most of those statutes, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA) and have defended regulatory enforcement proceedings before agencies ranging from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In addition, our attorneys have represented clients in other policy-making activities at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), on Capitol Hill, and in several international forums. In the international arena we provide counsel with respect to Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical substances (REACH), Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive, Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive, and a range of international environmental treaties including the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade, the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, and the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer.
Recent highlights of our docket include:
- Obtaining dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of a challenge by environmental activists to EPA re-registration of azinphos methyl pesticide products (AZM), over the opposition of both EPA and plaintiffs, and obtaining affirmance of that decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
- Obtaining dismissal in two U.S. District Courts in California of environmentalist challenges to the EPA’s re-registration of pesticides products after alleged violation of, inter alia, the ESA.
- Successfully challenging in the Fourth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, a District Court dismissal of a challenge to a Biological Opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service under ESA, and current pursuit of summary judgment on the merits after remand.
- Successfully defending, on behalf of industry stakeholders, EPA regulations allocating methyl bromide allowances under the CAA.
- Successfully challenging EPA’s National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for lead battery manufacturers.
- Successfully representing two companies in the first FIFRA data compensation case in which a submitter of data in support of one product sought payments from registrants of another product. Our Group has successfully represented over the last 30 years both claimants and respondents in numerous other data compensation/cost-sharing arbitrations under FIFRA.
Wiley Rein also has considerable experience in environmental auditing and other corporate compliance activities. In 1981, David B. Weinberg co-authored one of the first books on the subject, and over the years the Team has continued to undertake audits and provide strategic counseling.
ISSUE: JULY 2014
IN THIS ISSUE
- A Framework Emerges for EPA FIFRA/ESA Compliance
- Vermont Leads the Way, Passes Primary Battery Recycling Legislation; Other States to Follow in 2015
- Supreme Court to Review Administrative Procedure Act’s Notice and Comment Requirements in Context of Interpretative Rules
- Industry Opposition to CPSC Voluntary Recalls Proposal Bolstered by Former Agency Chairman
- More Food Fights to Come: Supreme Court Opens the Door to Lanham Act Claims for False or Misleading Food Labels
Appellate ESA Decisions May Prompt More Emphasis on Economic Considerations
By David B. Weinberg
May 23, 2014 | Bloomberg BNA's Daily Environment Report
DOE, EPA, and States Take Action on Battery Charger and External Power Supply Energy Efficiency
By John A. Hodges
February 28, 2014
Interstate Water Compacts: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Tarrant Decision and the Risk of Silence
By Steven Richardson
October 15, 2013 | The Water Report
RECENT NEWSNew Decision Clarifies Breadth of Potential “Take” Suits
July 2, 2014
New Decision Clarifies Breadth of Potential “Take” Suits
July 2, 2014