<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>government_contracts RSS - Wiley Rein</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/rss//practices/government_contracts/rss.xml</link><description></description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:34:20 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:34:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><generator>Wiley Rein RSS Tool</generator><ttl>60</ttl><copyright>Copyright 2012 Wiley Rein LLP</copyright><item><title>Law360 Names Wiley Rein "Government Contracts Group of the Year"</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/newsroom.cfm?sp=newsreleases&amp;id=712</link><description><![CDATA[For the second, consecutive year, Wiley Rein's Government Contracts Practice has been named a "Government Contracts Group of the Year" by Law360 for having "stepped up in a big way at moments when clients risked losing critical government relationships."]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/newsroom.cfm?sp=newsreleases&amp;id=712</guid></item><item><title>Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Finds Government Claim Relating to Voluntary Change to Accounting Practices Untimely</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7771</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7771</guid></item><item><title>Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Finds Government Claim Relating to Voluntary Change to Accounting Practices Untimely</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7771</link><description><![CDATA[In a January 6, 2012 decision, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) held that a claim asserted by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) relating to the alleged cost impact of a contractor's voluntary change to its accounting practices was untimely under the six-year statute of limitations in the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C.    7101-7109.  Because the claim was untimely, the Board held that it was a "nullity."  The decision adds to the relatively sparse body of case law applying the CDA's statute of limitations to Government claims. ]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7771</guid></item><item><title>"Fatally Flawed Statistically and Therefore Unreasonable" Armed Services Board Finds DCAA Executive Compensation Review Methodology Defenseless</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7763</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7763</guid></item><item><title>"Fatally Flawed Statistically and Therefore Unreasonable" Armed Services Board Finds DCAA Executive Compensation Review Methodology Defenseless</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7763</link><description><![CDATA[In a decision dated January 18, 2012, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals agreed with the Appellant that the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) method for analyzing the reasonableness of executive compensation under FAR 31.205-6 was subject to "statistical flaws" which rendered Government affirmative claims of nearly $600,000 untenable. ]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7763</guid></item></channel></rss>
