<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>insurance RSS - Wiley Rein</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/rss//practices/insurance/rss.xml</link><description></description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:34:39 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:34:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><generator>Wiley Rein RSS Tool</generator><ttl>60</ttl><copyright>Copyright 2012 Wiley Rein LLP</copyright><item><title>Events/Speeches: 2012 &amp; Beyond: A Look Ahead to the New Coverage and Allocation Issues</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/events.cfm?id=2542</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/events.cfm?id=2542</guid></item><item><title>Events/Speeches: The Roles of Mediation and Insurance in Bet the Company Litigation</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/events.cfm?id=2551</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/events.cfm?id=2551</guid></item><item><title>Case Filed by Minnesota Raises Significant HIPAA Enforcement Issues</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7786</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7786</guid></item><item><title>Case Filed by Minnesota Raises Significant HIPAA Enforcement Issues</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7786</link><description><![CDATA[A recent lawsuit brought by the Attorney General of Minnesota raises significant recent enforcement issues related to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  This development is important to both HIPAA covered entities and, even more significantly, to business associates under the HIPAA rules.  ]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7786</guid></item><item><title>Events/Speeches: The Fundamentals of Cyber and Data Risk Insurance: What Privacy and Compliance Officers and Attorneys Now Need to Factor in for Data Breach Cost Assessment</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/events.cfm?id=2530</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/events.cfm?id=2530</guid></item><item><title>Covered Loss Includes Enhanced Portion of Fee Award in Bump-Up Suit</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7776</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7776</guid></item><item><title>Covered Loss Includes Enhanced Portion of Fee Award in Bump-Up Suit</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7776</link><description><![CDATA[Applying Illinois law, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has held that the carve-out in the definition of &#8220;loss&#8221; for the &#8220;multiplied portion of multiplied damages&#8221; did not apply to the enhanced portion of a fee award in a &#8220;bump-up suit&#8221; even though the total award was calculated by multiplying by five the amount of fees arrived at through the &#8220;lodestar&#8221; method. ]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7776</guid></item><item><title>Claim for Negligent Overdraft of Attorney Escrow Account Arises out of Provision of Legal Services</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7773</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7773</guid></item><item><title>Claim for Negligent Overdraft of Attorney Escrow Account Arises out of Provision of Legal Services</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7773</link><description><![CDATA[Applying New York law, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, has held that a suit against an insured law firm involving an overdraft of the firm&#8217;s escrow account is a claim that &#8220;arises out of&#8221; the &#8220;rendering of professional legal services&#8221; and thus triggers the duty to defend under a professional liability policy.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7773</guid></item><item><title>Court Must Consider Extrinsic Evidence To Determine Ambiguity under California Law</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7775</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7775</guid></item><item><title>Court Must Consider Extrinsic Evidence To Determine Ambiguity under California Law</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7775</link><description><![CDATA[The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California has denied opposing motions for judgment on the pleadings seeking declarations as to coverage for lawsuits and other matters under directors and officers insurance policies because the court determined that it would have to consider extrinsic evidence before analyzing whether the policy language at issue was unambiguous.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7775</guid></item><item><title>Insurer's Retention and Reliance On Outside Counsel In Handling Claim Does Not Negate Privilege and Work Product Protection</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7774</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7774</guid></item><item><title>Insurer's Retention and Reliance On Outside Counsel In Handling Claim Does Not Negate Privilege and Work Product Protection</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7774</link><description><![CDATA[The United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi has held that an insurer did not waive the attorney-client privilege when, in response to questions posed by the insured, it stated it had relied on counsel in determining to deny coverage.&#160; ]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7774</guid></item><item><title>Insurer Liable for Default Judgment Against Insured Where Asserted Policy Exclusions Did Not Apply</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7769</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7769</guid></item><item><title>Insurer Liable for Default Judgment Against Insured Where Asserted Policy Exclusions Did Not Apply</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7769</link><description><![CDATA[The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, has held that, based on the allegations of the underlying complaint, two policy exclusions did not bar coverage for underlying litigation in which a default judgment had been entered against the insured.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7769</guid></item><item><title>Failure to Report Claim During Claims-Made and Reported Period Not a "Coverage Defense" for Purposes of Florida Waiver Statute</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7766</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7766</guid></item><item><title>Failure to Report Claim During Claims-Made and Reported Period Not a "Coverage Defense" for Purposes of Florida Waiver Statute</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7766</link><description><![CDATA[A federal district court in Florida has held that an insurer&#8217;s failure to comply with the timing requirement of Section 627.426 of the Florida Statutes did not preclude it from denying coverage for a claim not reported during the policy&#8217;s claims-made and reported period.&#160;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7766</guid></item><item><title>FTC Investigation Is a Claim Triggering Reporting Requirements</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7764</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7764</guid></item><item><title>FTC Investigation Is a Claim Triggering Reporting Requirements</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7764</link><description><![CDATA[The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, applying Ohio law, has held that a policyholder's duty to provide notice of a claim first arose when it received a formal FTC investigation order. ]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7764</guid></item><item><title>Insurer May No Longer Delay Notifying Insured of Known Grounds for Denying Death or Bodily Injury Claim While Investigating Other Potential Grounds</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7760</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7760</guid></item><item><title>Insurer May No Longer Delay Notifying Insured of Known Grounds for Denying Death or Bodily Injury Claim While Investigating Other Potential Grounds</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7760</link><description><![CDATA[The New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, has overruled its prior holding and concluded that an insurer with knowledge of a late notice defense to coverage for a death or bodily injury claim must advise the insured of such &#8220;as soon as reasonably possible&#8221; even though its investigation of other potential defenses to coverage may be ongoing.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7760</guid></item><item><title>Undefined Term "Services" Ambiguous in Context of E&amp;O Exclusion</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7761</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7761</guid></item><item><title>Undefined Term "Services" Ambiguous in Context of E&amp;O Exclusion</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7761</link><description><![CDATA[Applying California law, a federal district court has held that the undefined term &#8220;services&#8221; was ambiguous in the context of an errors and omissions exclusion endorsed onto a directors, officers and organization liability policy.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=7761</guid></item></channel></rss>
