<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>kimberly_m_melvin RSS - Wiley Rein</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/rss//professionals/kimberly_m_melvin/rss.xml</link><description></description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:22:36 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:22:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><generator>Wiley Rein RSS Tool</generator><ttl>60</ttl><copyright>Copyright 2012 Wiley Rein LLP</copyright><item><title>Executive Summary - May 9, 2012 - Home Depot ERISA Stock Drop Case: Eleventh Circuit Adopts Moench Presumption of Prudence and Rejects Duty to Disclose Non Public Corporate Information under ERISA</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;newsletter=1&amp;id=8031</link><description><![CDATA[On May 8, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its long&#160;awaited decision in Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc., -- F.3d --, 2012 WL 1580614 (11th Cir. May 8, 2012).&#160; Adopting the presumption of prudence first set forth in Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553 (3d Cir. 1995), the court affirmed the dismissal of a stock drop case brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by participants in a Home Depot retirement plan.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:22:03 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;newsletter=1&amp;id=8031</guid></item></channel></rss>
