<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Publications RSS - Wiley Rein</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/rss/publications/rss.xml</link><description></description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:34:02 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:34:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><generator>Wiley Rein RSS Tool</generator><ttl>60</ttl><copyright>Copyright 2010 Wiley Rein LLP</copyright><item><title>Insured vs. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit by Board Member</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6296</link><description><![CDATA[The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, applying Minnesota law, has held that the insured vs. insured exclusion in an insured corporation&#8217;s D&O policy precluded coverage for lawsuits involving one of the corporation&#8217;s board members as an adverse party.&#160;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6296</guid></item><item><title>Installation of Software a "Wrongful Act" under Technology E&amp;O Policy</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6297</link><description><![CDATA[Applying Minnesota law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has held that an insurer had a duty to defend under a "Information and Network Technology Errors and Omissions" policy because a lawsuit asserting that the insured software manufacturer installed tracking cookies and "spyware" on the underlying claimant's computer alleged a "wrongful act."]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6297</guid></item><item><title>FCC Seeks Comment on Implementation of Digital Signal Testing Provisions in STELA</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6298</link><description><![CDATA[On July 28, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to implement key provisions in the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA) related to determining what homes are eligible to receive distant signals from a Digital Broadcast Satellite (DBS) provider.  ]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6298</guid></item><item><title>DOJ Issues Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Applying the Americans with Disabilities Act to Websites Operated by Public Accommodations, Including Those with a Web-Only Presence</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6294</link><description><![CDATA[Twenty years to the day since President George H.W. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) into law, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) announcing that it was considering issui...]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6294</guid></item><item><title>FCC Annual Regulatory Fees Due August 31</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6295</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has set the deadline for the payment of FY 2010 annual regulatory fees. In order to avoid a 25% late payment penalty, regulatory fees must be received by the FCC no later than 11:59 PM, ET, August 31, 2010.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6295</guid></item><item><title>Florida Approves First Non-Admitted Reinsurer under New Rule Relaxing Collateral Requirements</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6291</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6291</guid></item><item><title>Policy Proceeds Not Property of Bankruptcy Estate Because Payment of Proceeds Would Not Affect Estate Assets</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6275</link><description><![CDATA[The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has held that policy proceeds were not part of the insured entity&#8217;s bankruptcy estate because previous entity claims were dismissed with prejudice, it was highly speculative that the bankruptcy trustee would approve indemnification of directors and officers and the policy&#8217;s priority of payment provision provided that entity coverage was only available after payment of proceeds for direct coverage to insured persons.&#160;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6275</guid></item><item><title>Policy Application Does Not Require Disclosure of Pending Claims Unless It Asks for Such Disclosure</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6276</link><description><![CDATA[The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has held that an application for a management protection insurance policy did not require an insured to disclose any past, pending or future litigation and, therefore, the insured did not make any misrepresentations in its policy application when it failed to disclose information regarding an underlying lawsuit arising out of a traffic accident.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6276</guid></item><item><title>Legal Look: 'Unconstitutionally Vague' FCC Policy Highlights Indecency</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6274</link><description><![CDATA[You probably saw the headlines last week when, in the so-called fleeting expletives case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declared the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) indecency policy &#8220;unconstitutionally vague.&#8221;&#160; What does it mean for broadcast newsrooms?&#160;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6274</guid></item><item><title>Overview of the Bankruptcy Process</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6269</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6269</guid></item><item><title>Timely Notice from Underlying Claimant Sufficient Despite Provision Requiring Insured to Provide Notice of Claim</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6270</link><description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals of Indiana, applying Indiana law, has held that notice of a claim provided by an attorney&#8217;s clients to his malpractice insurer was proper as a matter of law where notice was given during the policy period and where notice from the insured himself was an impossibility.&#160; ]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6270</guid></item><item><title>No Coverage for Post-Policy Period Claims Where Notice of Circumstances During Policy Period Was Insufficient</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6271</link><description><![CDATA[The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, has held that there is no coverage for post-policy period claims where an insured&#8217;s notice of circumstances during the policy period was insufficiently specific.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6271</guid></item><item><title>New North Korean Sanctions Anticipated</title><link>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6272</link><description><![CDATA[On July 22, 2010, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the United States will impose further sanctions on North Korea in an effort to weaken the North Korean government led by Kim Jong Il.&#160; The economic sanctions will target the finances of the North Korean elite, as well as take action against counterfeiting, money laundering and weapons trade.&#160;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://www.wileyrein.com/publications.cfm?sp=articles&amp;id=6272</guid></item></channel></rss>